Matellio
Global enterprise software development with AI agent services
Founded 2014 | San Jose, CA, USA | 101-250 employees | Last updated: August 2026
enterprise-automationworkflow-integrationtask-automation
What is Matellio?
Matellio was founded in 2014 by Dilip Singh and Apoorv Gehlot and is headquartered in San Jose, California, with a global presence including the UK, France, and Germany. Employee counts range from roughly 147 to 250+ across sources, and the firm builds custom AI agents as part of a broader enterprise software development practice.
Matellio was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in San Jose, CA, USA. The firm employs 101-250 people and works primarily with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing sectors. Its primary differentiator is: US-HQ enterprise software firm with true multi-country delivery (UK, France, Germany) beyond a single offshore hub.
Matellio tech stack and services
OpenAILangChainAWSAzure
| Service area | Details |
|---|---|
| Enterprise software modernization with embedded agents | Available for Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing clients |
| Workflow automation agents | Available for Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing clients |
| Multi-country delivery programs | Available for Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing clients |
Matellio use cases
Short answer: Matellio is best suited for enterprises wanting AI agents built alongside a larger custom software modernization project.
| Use case | Industries | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise software modernization with embedded agents | Fintech, Healthcare | OpenAI, LangChain |
| Workflow automation agents | Fintech, Healthcare | OpenAI, LangChain |
| Multi-country delivery programs | Fintech, Healthcare | OpenAI, LangChain |
Matellio pricing
Short answer: Matellio uses a fixed project, dedicated team pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at $25K.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From $25K | Well-defined scope |
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| T&M | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Matellio does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Matellio pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +True multi-country European delivery footprint (UK, France, Germany), not just one offshore hub | -AI agents are one line within a broader enterprise software practice, not the company's sole focus |
| +Enterprise software development pedigree supports agents embedded in larger systems | -Employee-count estimates vary meaningfully across sources (147 to 250+) |
| +US headquarters simplifies contracting for North American buyers |
Matellio vs alternatives
How Matellio compares to the other top AI Agent developers.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turing | Engineering-heavy teams needing elite technical talent for reasoning-heavy... | Deep AGI-infrastructure focus (reasoning, coding, complex problem-solving) backed by a very large vetted engineering bench | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Spiral Scout | CTOs who want to evaluate a vendor's own... | Built and maintains its own agent orchestration runtime (Wippy.ai), plus certified Temporal Solution Provider status | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | Teams that need a senior, agent-specialist team without... | 100% of delivery staff are senior AI engineers — no junior bench, no agent-to-generalist handoff | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Vstorm | Mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting a boutique team... | Verified enterprise client roster (Mercedes-Benz, Intel) despite a small team size | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | Large enterprises needing public-company scale, compliance rigor, and... | Publicly traded (Nasdaq: GDYN) with 4,500+ engineers — unmatched scale and financial transparency in this roster | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | Enterprises wanting a three-decade engineering firm with deep... | 30+ years of engineering discipline applied to a documented spec-driven approach for agentic workflows | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprises needing large-scale, multi-year AI agent engineering programs... | 2,400+ engineers with 20+ years of engineering track record predating its agentic AI practice | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Waverley Software | Technical buyers in FinTech, Healthcare, or Robotics wanting... | 30+ years of engineering history explicitly repositioned as AI-first, with deep vertical domain experience (Robotics, Energy, FinTech) | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Andersen | Enterprises wanting a single vendor with true multi-vertical... | 3,500+ engineers with named vertical specialization across 7+ industries, not a single-domain shop | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Ascendion | Global 2000 buyers wanting an AI-native engineering firm... | Built from inception (2022) around AI-powered engineering rather than retrofitting AI onto a legacy delivery model | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| GeekyAnts | Product teams wanting AI-agent features embedded into a... | 18+ years of product engineering combined with an active internal AI-agent R&D program (Geekathon) | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Innowise | Buyers wanting large-scale offshore delivery capacity with an... | 3,500+ person full-cycle software firm with a dedicated internal AI Hub, not a small AI-only shop | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Ideas2IT | Engineering-heavy buyers interested in AI-augmented software delivery, not... | Proprietary Agentic SDLC Studio applying agents to its own software delivery process, not just client-facing products | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Trantor | Enterprises wanting a dedicated, captive engineering center rather... | CaptiveCoE™ model gives clients a dedicated center of excellence rather than a shared delivery pool | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Netguru | Digital product companies wanting a proven internal-agent case... | Publicly documented internal production agent (Omega) as proof of applied agent-building capability | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Kanerika | Data-heavy enterprises wanting agents tied directly into existing... | Named, production-deployed internal agent suite (Karl, DokGPT, and others) beyond generic client demos | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Quytech | Buyers wanting agentic AI paired with computer vision... | Broader AI portfolio spanning agentic AI, computer vision, and AR/VR beyond agents alone | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Sombra | Buyers wanting a mid-size dedicated-team partner with a... | Founder-led (Viktor Chekh) firm with over a decade of full-cycle engineering ahead of its AI/ML expansion | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Intuz | Buyers wanting a documented count of live production... | Reports 100+ enterprise agent deployments already in production across three named framework stacks | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Azilen Technologies | FinTech, HRTech, and manufacturing buyers wanting vertical-specific AI... | Explicit vertical focus across FinTech, manufacturing, and HRTech rather than horizontal generalism | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Instinctools | Enterprises wanting a long-tenured European engineering partner for... | 25 years of continuous engineering delivery under the same founding leadership, spanning Germany and the US | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Miquido | Product-focused technical teams wanting an analyst-recognized AI engineering... | Independently recognized by Clutch as a Global Leader in Artificial Intelligence, not just self-marketed | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| EffectiveSoft | Buyers wanting established Eastern European engineering depth under... | 25 years of software delivery history with dedicated Eastern European development centers | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Azumo | Buyers wanting nearshore delivery cost savings without giving... | Primarily referral-driven client base including named enterprise brands (Meta, UnitedHealth) | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| DevSquad | Early-to-growth-stage product teams wanting agent development paired with... | Combines product-market-fit strategy work with AI agent development, useful for teams still validating their product | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Cogniteq | EU-based buyers wanting a Baltic-region engineering partner with... | 20 years of full-cycle software delivery based in the EU (Lithuania), useful for EU data-residency needs | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Deviniti | Teams already on Atlassian tooling wanting AI agents... | Atlassian marketplace-app pedigree gives it unusually deep workflow-tool integration experience | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| DevCom | Buyers wanting a single US-HQ vendor to own... | Full lifecycle ownership (strategy through production support) under one US-headquartered vendor | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| Softermii | Startups wanting a US-facing account team backed by... | Dedicated Kyiv R&D center paired with US-based (LA/Vegas) client-facing presence | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| Codebridge Technology | Cost-sensitive buyers wanting a Delaware-incorporated vendor with Ukrainian... | US legal incorporation (Delaware) paired with Kyiv-based engineering delivery for contracting simplicity | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| Uvik Software | Startups needing one or two senior Python/AI engineers... | Narrow staff-augmentation model of individual senior Python/AI/ML specialists at low minimum spend | 3.3 | Full comparison |
| Riseup Labs | Highly cost-sensitive buyers who need ISO-certified process rigor... | ISO 9001 and 27001 certification brings documented process/security rigor at a low-cost delivery base | 3.3 | Full comparison |
Matellio FAQ
What is Matellio?
Matellio was founded in 2014 by Dilip Singh and Apoorv Gehlot and is headquartered in San Jose, California, with a global presence including the UK, France, and Germany. Employee counts range from roughly 147 to 250+ across sources, and the firm builds custom AI agents as part of a broader enterprise software development practice.
How much does Matellio charge?
Matellio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Matellio use?
Matellio works with OpenAI, LangChain, AWS, Azure. Primary industries served include Fintech, Healthcare, Manufacturing.
Is Matellio right for enterprise?
Enterprises wanting AI agents built alongside a larger custom software modernization project. 101-250 team size. Key consideration: AI agents are one line within a broader enterprise software practice, not the company's sole focus.
What are the best Matellio alternatives?
The best alternatives to Matellio depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Turing: deep agi-infrastructure focus (reasoning, coding, complex problem-solving) backed by a very large vetted engineering bench
- Spiral Scout: built and maintains its own agent orchestration runtime (wippy.ai), plus certified temporal solution provider status
- Tensorway: 100% of delivery staff are senior ai engineers — no junior bench, no agent-to-generalist handoff
Compare Matellio with other AI Agent developers
Matellio vs Turing Matellio vs Spiral Scout Matellio vs Tensorway Matellio vs Vstorm Matellio vs Grid Dynamics Matellio vs SoftServe Matellio vs N-iX Matellio vs Waverley Software Matellio vs Andersen Matellio vs Ascendion Matellio vs GeekyAnts Matellio vs Innowise Matellio vs Ideas2IT Matellio vs Trantor Matellio vs Netguru Matellio vs Kanerika Matellio vs Quytech Matellio vs Sombra Matellio vs Intuz Matellio vs Azilen Technologies Matellio vs Instinctools Matellio vs Miquido Matellio vs EffectiveSoft Matellio vs Azumo Matellio vs DevSquad Matellio vs Cogniteq Matellio vs Deviniti Matellio vs DevCom Matellio vs Softermii Matellio vs Codebridge Technology Matellio vs Uvik Software Matellio vs Riseup Labs
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with Matellio before making a decision.